New Hampshire’s affordability, education, and fiscal challenges are connected. A solution that looks good in one budget can still shift costs to schools, towns, or families.
I want state policy to begin with sound information, honest tradeoffs, and a clear plan for implementation — followed by measurable results.
Choose an issue
What would you like to explore?
Protect taxpayers from state cost shifts.
A state budget is not responsible if it balances by pushing costs onto towns, schools, and local property taxpayers.
New Hampshire needs to examine how state tax decisions interact with local bills — and prepare for the next recession before it arrives. Short-term savings should be judged against their long-term consequences.
What I’d focus on
- Stress-test state budgets and revenue assumptions against plausible downturns.
- Evaluate reserve adequacy and establish credible contingency plans.
- Make state-to-local cost shifts visible and examine alternatives before they occur.
- Explain tax-policy tradeoffs rather than promising savings without identifying who pays.
Strengthen public schools and student outcomes.
Students need great schools. Taxpayers deserve accountability. Schools and state leaders should work together on both.
Declining enrollment does not automatically translate into equivalent cost savings; transportation, specialized services, buildings, and other fixed costs take time to adjust. We need a constructive strategy that puts student learning at the center.
What I’d focus on
- Improve literacy, math, attendance, and preparation for life after graduation.
- Make school spending and outcomes easier for parents and taxpayers to compare.
- Plan for enrollment changes, facilities, and special education costs.
- Explore shared services and regional cooperation where the evidence supports them.
Make attainable housing possible.
Housing costs shape whether young people stay, employers can hire, and communities can sustain essential services.
Housing and infrastructure need to be planned together. Local leaders need practical tools to guide growth in ways that respect community character while creating more options for working families, seniors, and younger residents.
What I’d focus on
- Support locally driven zoning and housing solutions that add choices.
- Help communities address the infrastructure needs that make growth possible.
- Connect housing planning to local fiscal conditions and workforce needs.
- Evaluate long-term impacts rather than making decisions one project at a time.
Connect education, childcare, and careers.
New Hampshire’s future depends on people being able to work, raise families, build careers, and stay here.
Schools, colleges, employers, training programs, childcare providers, and housing policy are parts of the same economic system. Working on them together can create clearer pathways from education into opportunity.
What I’d focus on
- Expand high-school and college-to-career connections aligned with local jobs.
- Strengthen partnerships among employers, schools, colleges, and training programs.
- Address childcare capacity and workforce barriers that keep parents out of work.
- Measure whether investments improve the ability to live and work in New Hampshire.
Make local control real.
Towns need both the authority and the practical capacity to solve problems.
I believe government should be limited where it should be, capable where it must be, and accountable everywhere. That requires thoughtful state-local partnerships and transparent measures of performance — not unfunded mandates or one-size-fits-all rules.
What I’d focus on
- Examine the local consequences of state legislation before adoption.
- Support long-range capital and infrastructure planning.
- Set clear objectives for major programs and report on results.
- Find common ground on problems that do not fit neatly into party labels.
Dig deeper
Interested in the analysis behind these positions?
Read NH Insights for context, assumptions, and longer explanations of New Hampshire’s policy choices.